Darya Astakhova vs Ikumi Yamazaki Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 22 Oct at 01:04 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Astakhova vs I. Yamazaki

RUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Astakhova 1 - 0 Yamazaki
They have played 3 sets in total, with Darya Astakhova winning 2 and Ikumi Yamazaki winning 1. The last match between Darya Astakhova and Ikumi Yamazaki was at the W35 Qian Daohu, 22-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Darya Astakhova getting the victory 6-7(5) 6-3 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Astakhova | 1 |
| Yamazaki | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 Qian Daohu(10-22-25)
D. Astakhova vs I. Yamazaki H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $72,000 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 65.95% (215-111) | Career Total W/L | 60.65% (131-85) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 6 | Titles | 3 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
D. Astakhova vs I. Yamazaki Match Preview:
- In recent months, Ikumi Yamazaki has a slight edge in second serve performance, securing 40.21% of points compared to Darya Astakhova's 35.41%.
- Regarding return game stats, Darya Astakhova outperforms by winning 51.37% of her opponent's second serve points, slightly higher than Ikumi Yamazaki's 49.30%.
- How do they fare on first serve returns? Darya boasts 37.72%, while Ikumi shows 34.63% accuracy.
- Under pressure, Ikumi Yamazaki marginally leads by saving 45.88% of breakpoints, compared to Darya Astakhova's 44.04%.
- Looking at past year performance, Darya winning 60% of matches slightly edges out Ikumi's 58.93% win rate.
- Darya's best surface is Clay with a 69% win rate, whereas Ikumi excels on Grass, also winning 69% of matches.
- Both players predominantly participate in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, with Darya showing a 57.89% win rate and Ikumi securing 54.90%.
- Darya has faced higher caliber opponents with an average rank of 319.83, surpassing Ikumi's average opponent rank of 464.27.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Ikumi holds an advantage, having won 63% in such scenarios against Darya's 56%.
- Current event form is crucial, so examining their latest performance may provide additional insights.
Editorial Prediction (October 22, 2025, UTC):
Drawing from recent performance metrics, Ikumi Yamazaki holds a slight advantage in second serve efficiency. In a close contest, this can be a pivotal element, especially when managing lengthy rallies.
However, Darya Astakhova displays superior return stats, both on the first and second serves. These statistics suggest an ability to potentially overcome any serving deficiencies by capitalizing on the return game.
Under pressure situations, Ikumi's marginally higher success in saving breakpoints may influence tightly contested games. Additionally, if the match reaches a deciding set, Ikumi has historically performed well.
Considering overall performance, experience against tougher opponents, and surface preferences, Darya has small advantages in several areas, suggesting she can better handle higher-ranked competition.
Factoring these insights, Darya Astakhova seems poised to edge out as the more likely victor in this matchup, leveraging her robust return game and past experience on tougher circuits.
Darya Astakhova vs Ikumi Yamazaki Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
D. Astakhova vs I. Yamazaki H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 10 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:47:25 | Average Match Time | 2:47:25 |
| 71% (60/85) | 1st Serve % | 65% (63/97) |
| 60% (36/60) | 1st Serve Win % | 48% (30/63) |
| 56% (14/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (15/34) |
| 43% (9/21) | Break Pts Won % | 67% (4/6) |
| 54% (52/97) | Return Points Win % | 41% (35/85) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
D. Astakhova Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
QF | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 6-7(5) 6-3 6-0 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-0 6-4 | ||
I. Yamazaki Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-4 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-7(5) 6-3 6-0 | ||
R2 | L | 7-6(6) 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 6-3 | ||

D. Astakhova vs I. Yamazaki Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65.95% (215/111) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.65% (131/85) |
| 62.23% (453/275) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.33% (287/205) |
| 55.74% (3608/2865) | Games Win/Loss | 53.20% (2367/2082) |
| 62.69% (42/25) | Hard Win/Loss | 54.81% (57/47) |
| 69.13% (159/71) | Clay Win/Loss | 67.53% (52/25) |
| 50.00% (14/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53.57% (15/13) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 100.00% (7/0) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 287 | Aces Total | 150 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 924 | Total Double Faults | 584 |
| 1:35:50 | Average Match Time | 1:29:15 |
| 454.15 | Average Opponent Rank | 426.37 |
| 64% (12681/19779) | 1st Serve % | 69% (8258/11975) |
| 60% (7567/12681) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (4760/8258) |
| 46% (3255/7098) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (1624/3717) |
| 51% (1493/2919) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (813/1633) |
| 50% (10095/20305) | Return Points Win % | 48% (5804/12131) |
| 14.29% (1/6) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 62.56% (127/76) | Challenger W/L | 59.39% (98/67) |
| 76.32% (87/27) | Futures W/L | 66.00% (33/17) |
| 66% (206/313) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (128/212) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 50% (23/46) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 63% (20/32) |
| 63% (55/88) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (35/61) |
| 93% (200/186) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (119/108) |
| 7% (200/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (119/11) |
| 22% (126/28) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (96/23) |